Skip to main content

The Science


The research behind this piece isn't cherry-picked. These are peer-reviewed studies. Some of them have been cited thousands of times.  They have independently arrived at the same conclusion: skepticism is a defense mechanism, not a personality flaw.



Dietvorst, Simmons & Massey  (2015). "Algorithm Aversion: People Erroneously Avoid Algorithms After Seeing Them Err." Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000033


The foundational paper on how quickly human trust collapses after a machine makes a single visible mistake. Even when participants watched an algorithm outperform a human repeatedly, they still chose the inferior human option once they'd seen the algorithm err. Cited over 4,000 times. The data behind the argument that seeing the machine clearly changes everything.



Dillard & Shen (2005). "On the Nature of Reactance: An Empirical Assessment of Four Conceptualizations."  Communication Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815


The classic framework proving that psychological reactance, the human urge to push back when something tries to control you, is both emotional and cognitive at the same time. When you feel manipulated, you get angry and you start arguing against it in your head. Both responses reinforce each other. This is the science underneath the Mental Firewall.




Steindl et al.  (2015). "Understanding Psychological Reactance: New Developments and Findings." Zeitschrift für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000222


A comprehensive review of how perceived threats to personal freedom trigger measurable, defiant behavioral overrides. Cited over 800 times. Reinforces the Dillard & Shen framework with updated findings,  the more clearly a person identifies an external system trying to limit their choices, the harder they push back.




Boerman et al.  (2023). "Consumers' Persuasion Knowledge of Algorithms in Social Media Advertising." International Journal of Advertising. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2023.2264045


Surveyed 450 users and sorted them into four groups based on their awareness of algorithmic persuasion. The largest group, called the "Control Paradox", knew they were being manipulated but felt powerless to stop it. The smallest group, "Skilled and Critical," had both the awareness and the coping tools to act on it. The gap between those two groups is exactly what this project is trying to close.




Metzler & Garcia (2023). "Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media." Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231185057


A research overview documenting how platform algorithms are optimized for corporate ad revenue rather than user wellbeing, and how the feedback loop between human behavior and algorithmic curation is largely invisible to the people inside it. Makes the predatory mechanics argument in peer-reviewed form without sensationalism, just data.




Gagrčin, Naab & Grub (2024). "Algorithmic Media Use and Algorithm Literacy: An Integrative Literature Review." New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241291137


A 2024 review of the research on algorithm literacy interventions and how they translate into real behavioral change. Distinguishes between users who merely "know"about algorithms and users who can actually act on that knowledge — and finds the gap between the two is where most literacy efforts fail. The reclamation argument in academic language.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why You Grab Your Phone When You're Bored

It's not laziness. It's not weakness. It's a slot machine in your pocket and you were never told that's what it was. Think about the last time you were bored. Not busy-bored. Actually bored. Sitting somewhere with nothing demanding your attention. A few minutes between things. A quiet moment that arrived without warning. What did you do? You already know the answer. We all do. But here's what I want to know. Why the phone specifically? Why not the television? Why not a book? Why not just sit there and let the boredom pass the way boredom used to pass, letting your mind wander or daydreaming? The answer is more specific than I expected. I t also explains something important about why putting the phone down is so much harder than it should be. It isn't about the content. When you turn on a television you know roughly what you're going to get. A comedy will be funny, a drama will be dramatic. The experience is predictable. You can look at the options, make a ch...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your Child's Most Dangerous Online Relationship Is Not With a Person.

Every school in the country teaches children about stranger danger online. About bullies. About the risks of sharing personal information with people they don’t know. These are real dangers. They deserve the attention they receive. But there is another danger operating at a scale that dwarfs all of them combined. It reaches every child with a device. It operates continuously, not occasionally. It requires no malicious human actor to function. And it is almost entirely absent from every online safety curriculum currently taught in schools. The danger is the algorithm itself. Not a stranger. Not a bully. Not a human being with harmful intentions. A system. Designed by some of the most sophisticated engineers on earth. Optimised for one purpose. To capture and hold attention for as long as possible. And running, right now, on the device in your child's pocket. What it does that stranger danger education doesn't address Traditional online safety education teaches children to recogn...
Post a Comment
Read more

This Is Intentional

  You may have noticed, this blog is plain. No images or dramatic design. No visual chosen to make you feel something before you've read a word. That's intentional. Everything here argues that the tools used to hold your attention online are engineered to activate your feelings before you form a thought. It would be strange to make that argument on a website doing the same thing. What you'll find here is words, questions, and the occasional uncomfortable fact. What you do with them is up to you. The store is on Gumroad rather than Amazon. Amazon is optimized. Every element of it is designed to keep you there, show you more, and convert your attention into a purchase. It is very good at this. Gumroad is not optimized. It has the slightly unfinished feel of the early internet, back when a website was just someone putting something they made in front of people who wanted it. No algorithm. No sponsored results. No system studying your behavior to figure out what to show you ne...
Post a Comment
Read more